Claim of conusance, common law: Defined to be, a question of jurisdiction between two courts, not a case of plea to the jurisdiction. Therefore, a man must demand conusance; claiming by right, jurisdiction of the cause the plaintiff has commenced out of the claimant’s court.

I don’t understand your code, can we just move this matter under the common law.

I require that we move this court to the common law side of the court, because right now we are on the wrong side of the court.

What one is doing, is making a claim of conusance, saying we are on the wrong side of the court.

It’s not your code to interpret. So, if someone is trying to tell you to interpret this code and give an answer: how do you think you’re going to answer to this code?

I’m not going to waste my time deciphering their code, I’m going to provide an answer in common law, in my common language: this is what I believe I did right, this is what I believe I did wrong.

Advertisements