My transcribe of karl lentz uncommonlaw talkshoe 002.
I only transcribe what I believe relevant, I find this a much faster way to learn, take down notes and revise.
My following notes cover: rights, property, presumption, conusance, jurisdiction, claims, false claims, writing, principles, law, code, incompetent, dealing honorably with fines, orders, penalties, debt, settling these matters, verify, gladly offering to pay, liability, submitting a proper answer or claim to the court. etc.
Does anyone have right to administer my property without right?
They [Government] operate under authority, not right.
Before addressing the court, say:
I require leave of court so I may properly place my claim before the court.
I require leave of court so I may answer their claim in a proper manner.
I require leave of court to submit a proper claim before this court, or to answer a proper claim before this court.
I require leave of court to provide an answer for this court.
Require (verb transitive): to demand: ask, as of right or by authority.
So when you require something, you do it by right and by authority.
I have a right, and by my authority I require leave so I may properly answer the court.
The man in the black robe must abide.
Well the court moved in error because I require leave. I’m not asking you, I’m telling you as of right and by authority.
Read the dictionary from A to Z, study it.
I’m going to need to see a claim, or I’m going to submit my own claim.
I don’t understand your code, can we just move this matter under the common law.
I require that we move this court to the common law side of the court, because right now we are on the wrong side of the court.
What one is doing, is making a claim of conusance, saying we are on the wrong side of the court.
It’s not your code to interpret. So, if someone is trying to tell you to interpret this code and give an answer: how do you think you’re going to answer to this code?
I’m not going to waste my time deciphering their code, I’m going to provide an answer in common law, in my common language: this is what I believe I did right, this is what I believe I did wrong.
I believe you have no right to do this to me. I believe you have no right to tell me what I can, or can not do with my money, or the money in my pocket. This is a nation in which I have the right to administer my own property in my own manner. (Example: property, claim, tax)
When you move them into the common law, only a man has standing in common law. The county has no standing in common law, technically there’s not going to be a voice. Only an attorney is going to be standing in their court, but the attorney cannot come to court as you can in a common law court.
In a common law court you are going to require of everybody to define or bring a motion, or move the common law court to do it under oath or affirmation, with first hand knowledge that either they’ve been harmed or they’ve incurred a loss due to your actions or in-actions.
Ask the person who is assessing you to sign that piece of paper and say I owe it and I will be more than glad to pay it. But all I need you to do is have you sign it, so that way if you’re wrong I can hold you liable.
Of course you can demand it, if someone is making a claim against your property, if someone is demanding you relinquish something, nobody has to have the right to do that, nobody can do it unless they have the right to do it. They can provide some statutory code, yeah that’s fine that’s special. Now I’m going to hold someone personally liable if they do it in error and it causes me harm. I’m going to need some man or woman to put their signature on that document, and I will be more than glad to pay the assessment. Or if I believe the assessment is in error, I will be more than glad to take that man or woman into a common law court of record, and I will dispute the claim in front of a jury.
Talk extremely nice and extremely simple.
I will be more than glad to do it, that would be a lovely thing to do, just show me you know, could I please have somebody’s autograph on here, can somebody please sign this and claim that I’m liable. Somebody please make a claim, I love settling claims, I will not argue the facts, I will not make complaints, I’m not going to argue, stand here or listen to complaints. I will answer all claims tendered to my person.
I’m going to have to adjust my claim depending on the jurisdiction of the property.
I’m going to have to move in different jurisdictions. I might meet people who will want to move their claim under their jurisdiction, and I’m going to have to adapt to it.
Once you realize the different jurisdictions these courts are trying to make you abide under, you say no. No code 1234 this, no ordinance this, no rule of civil procedure this. No, we are moving back over here. But they are going to try, and like I said when an attorney talks in court, or judges talk in court to each other, they will move jurisdiction so fast it will be like lightening. So, you say excuse me guys, I object! They say what? Get it back to this side of the court, none of that nonsense, you can’t bring none of that nonsense, that stuff belongs in your court. What’s the law before this court? The common law, this is the law I moved, because this is my claim, don’t try and drag it under some other jurisdiction.
Your claim has to be one sentence long, because that’s common law. Say it exactly the same way all the time: I say you uttered a forge instrument in which has interfered with my right to property.
They ask what are you here for?
Because of an utterance of a forge instrument has interfered with my right to property.
The judge might ask is there anything more to your claim?
No, just they uttered a forged instrument that has interfered with the rights of my property.
The other side might go: we don’t believe we uttered a forged instrument that has interfered with the rights of your property.
Okay, would you like me to stand on it, would you like me to present my evidence to this court now, is this court now ready to see my exhibits, take my testimony and have the witnesses appear.
Judge: Sure, let’s see it.
You state your claim, if you make your claim in the very beginning other than your simple sentence, you just lost common law jurisdiction. You start bringing in all kinds of different examples, and use their code. This is my claim, this is my law, he can’t bring his law into this court, he can’t bring that code nonsense. Where he get that code from, I didn’t write that code. What’s the law before this court now, the interpretation of my law is before this court at this time. Not his interpretation, my interpretation of the law, this is what I say the law says, this is how he interfered with my rights under this law.
Well answer the man’s law, did you or did you not interfere with his rights, according to his law his got the right to be left alone, his got the right to not be trespass. Did you trespass upon this man, yes or no? Which means the right to be left alone.
I make my claims under common law trespass, and under that forgery. What type of trespass, just forgery: you created a false document which led to somebody’s harm. Somebody believed in it and found out later it wasn’t true.
Sign at the bottom, and I say at the very beginning of the document: I verify all herein to be true. At the very top you can put verifiable claim. You put: Trespass, under that forgery, and then verifiable claim. When you answer my claim I will only accept verifiable answers, I will not accept certified answers. Because you’re just wasting my time if no man is going to appear. Anybody can certify anything, they hold no liability for the document, as it doesn’t mean anything on it is true.
An attorney is not competent to stand in common law. A man is not competent to stand in statutory law.
An attorney is incompetent to be a witness, his incompetent to testify.
Do you understand the code that this man is saying, no. Is there any law that says I must, no. Be glad to be incompetent in their courts, because you don’t have to stand there and speak.
Be incredibly polite, say: sorry for any inconvenience, but I’m incompetent to engage in any intercourse in commerce with you folks, I’m not competent to enter into such a foreign agreement. That way you have no standing, because you have no status, as you have absolutely no idea, because you aren’t the person who wrote the code, you have no capacity to understand any of this nonsense, because you don’t even know who even created this damn thing. You just say: it’s not my wish to be engage in this endeavor. I did not create this, I have no idea why this person is trying to contract with me, I’m not competent in this code, there’s nothing in law that requires me to be competent, and I can’t accept this wonderful gift or benefit at this time, as I perceive that it’s going to cause me harm.
Just because you receive a presentment or a gift, or a benefit, they think it’s a benefit, though you have to accept it, but you can send it back and say: I thought it was a great gift at that time, I thought I could really handle it, but it’s actually causing me great harm and stress, and I just can’t do it. I know that the person on the other side of this letter certainly doesn’t want to cause harm to me, because your agency or government was created by man, and is not to be the source of harm to man, but suppose to be a source of benefit.
If it’s not a trial, it’s a hearing.
Customs are at the top, laws underneath, then rules are at the bottom. Laws can be modified or interpreted, but the customs of the people always prevail.
I require leave of court so I can properly answer the claim before this court.
And I know there isn’t a proper claim submitted before this court, is that not true Judge? He knows it’s not true, it’s a complaint. He knows the difference between a claim and a complaint, only a man can make a claim.
You automatically lose your common law jurisdiction by citing their code. You’re dragging your claim into their code world, so they have the right to answer in a code.
Stop using big three syllable words, speak in one or two syllable words, plain language, in common nation words we use.
Just order for the property to be restore to its original jurisdiction.
You want to place an order. Keep it simple.
One sentence done: I require leave of court, is there a proper claim before this court so I may properly answer it?
Well let’s go to the other side. Is there a proper claim so I can answer it?
No, hmm, Judge what are we doing here? Is he making a false claim before this court, what’s he doing? You know what, now I’m going to need leave of court to make a claim against his false claim. I will be right back give me about 20 minutes, I will have a claim written before you.
Give me one sentence and I will be done.
Any man can point their finger across the court and say that man owes me back. That’s a claim, there’s the injury, there’s the wrong, there’s the harm, there’s the loss, there’s the breech of contract.
You don’t have to say it’s a common law court, just file your claim in court. It’s based on what you’re saying, if you said the cause of action is a trespass: administrating property without right. That’s pretty much says it all.
Just say you are a man, then they know you have rights. It’s self explanatory, because only man has rights, everybody else has duties, an obligation, are chartered, have privileges or something.
Just say I’m a man, but when I intercourse in commerce my name is Bill.
Just because you use a name doesn’t mean somebody has power over you or can get into your personal affairs. The only person you have to engage with is the person you put the paper work with saying: I will willingly sign this piece of paper and now I’m joined with you within the terms and conditions in this contract. But that doesn’t mean the person has full control of his body now.
Do not speak with the clerk of the court, speak to the court clerk if you’re having difficulties.
There’s no such thing as a statute of limitation. (It’s in the judiciary act of your state).
There are no rules, there are no latches that bind or bound a man, you can do whatever you want.
They can’t bind or bound you to a latch.
C.F : An abbreviation for the Latin word confer, meaning “compare.”
It’s so hot here, it’s like hell.
I believe that my claim of trespass is C.F [title 1943].
Government is bound to code.
Man is unlimited in his capacity.
Mario is bound to code, his limited to what the programmers coded.
When they fail to answer, your claim stands un-rebutted and you win.
Their customs is to answer a complaint, not a claim, is # months. But for a man it’s 21 days. (3 weeks)
The bible use to do it by starting at sun rise the books were opened, and then everything had to be balanced out by sun down.
If they fail to answer your claim, then you return to court and say this is going to be recorded as a default judgment, as they are never going to come back and say “hey you never verified your claim under oath or affirmation, that’s a void judgement.”
If you’re going up against a fictitious entity, like government, you can return to court and settle the matter as a default judgement.
Against a man you better have your judgement written on to the record of the court.
It stands true until somebody objects.
They usually operate 100% in their legal capacity.
They have no right to asses you if they operate outside of their capacity.
I have value, and I don’t want you to take value from me.
So do you believe a man has right to take money from another man.
That’s why you want to sue them on an individual capacity, because no man has right to take money from another man.
Tax assessors have a right and duty to make tax assessments, and that’s exactly what they do.
You can’t go after their official capacity, if they were operating within them. If this is what they can or cannot do, that’s what they are going to do.
Whose making a claim that because my yard looks a certain way, you have a claim that’s been filed in a proper jurisdiction in which somebody is compelling me to perform, or order me to do something, or modify my lifestyle, or make me work on my lawn without compensation.
So is somebody going to compensate me for maintaining my property in a manner they order or demand from me, because one must remember that involuntary servitude is unlawful.
Nobody can order you, or demand from you to perform, go to work, or clean up, or scrub a toilet, without fair and just compensation.
In regards to code enforcement, all you have to do is say: whose making the claim?
Obviously they are going to give you something called a complaint form, some county official is going to file a complaint form, not a claim form. So you say to the man when you get this complaint, that there is a complaint that you’re in violation. So they interfere with your rights, but you violate a code.
You don’t violate somebody’s rights, you don’t infringe on somebody’s rights, you interfere with somebody’s rights. Because rights mean to exercise, like you exercise your right to free speech, or you exercise your right to vote, or you exercise your right to move your left arm or left leg. So if I come and sit on your legs and you can’t move, I’m not infringing or violating, I’m interfering with your right to exercise them, I’m physically somehow restraining you from enjoying a right.
Oh will somebody like me to wake my leafs?
Oh yes the county or the city will really love if you wake your leafs.
Okay, send me a proposal, send me an offer, and I will be more than glad to consider the order.
Attorneys only propose orders. They pray for remedy or they pray for relief.
When a man in a common law court, we create the orders. We don’t pray for relief, we create the order. We say we order X Y or Z. We don’t propose an order, we aren’t proposing anyone to marry them, we aren’t trying to court the guy in the black robe. But the attorneys are trying to court the man in the black robe, his trying to win him over. A man isn’t trying to win him over, a man just says I order this. I’m a man and this is what I order.
So when a county personal comes over by you and says wake those leaves, you say: Oh! do you have an offer for me? What’s your offer?
I’m ordering you to wake those leaves and if you don’t wake those leaves I’m going to charge you $5000 a day.
Oh wonderful can I see that order? Would you like to order me to do that? Are you saying it’s $5000 to wake leaves? If I don’t wake them, is somebody going to come down and wake them, or you’re going to charge me $5000?
Well that’s lovely, let me see that in writing, write me a proposal and sign it.
If he signs it you drag him in court personally liable for it. But he might sign it as a county code enforcement officer, that way you can hold his department liable for the bill. So, you wake your leaves and then say here you go, I wake the leaves and you said that if somebody had to come it would be $5000. So I’m asking for compensation because I was ordered to wake the leaves, if I don’t wake the leaves this is the order that says if I don’t wake them somebody is going to come and wake them for me and charge me $5000 for it. So you just tender the bill back, to the agency that presented you with a bill. If they don’t want to pay you, then you just file a claim in a common law court that you were ordered to perform and involuntary servitude is not permitted in this country, it’s not tolerated. You performed under the order of the county and now you want compensation. They can’t order you to do something without compensation.
So they are going to say you’re a citizen or a resident, so you have to follow orders.
I’m going to say you’re presuming an awful lot. It’s an awful leap of faith presuming that I’m a citizen or a resident here, are you going to be able to swear to that under oath or affirmation in a common law court? Do you know that for a fact, because an attorney can’t come and swear under oath or affirmation in a common law court. Only a man can swear and have first hand knowledge. So you say to the man whose making a claim against you that says he will swear to it, go on the witness stand and say: so how long have a lived here for? are you sure that I live here? How do you know that I live here just because you’ve seen me here, how do you know I’m not a guest, that I’m not just visiting here? How do you know that I’m liable for the property? How do you know I’m the owner of that house? All you did was order me to do something now you’re going to have to compensate me for that order. I carried out your order, one man orders another man to do something, now I want compensation.
How do I answer when a court compels me to answer discovery.
All man is proper in his papers, you don’t have to relinquish any of your property or any paper. Unless you failed to show the court you’re not under their jurisdiction.
You hope that they ignore you, because that’s proof that you tried to settle the matter on the private side and you are not exhausting all administrative remedies, they are. They are acting in dishonor, so you hope they ignore it. But don’t keep sending the same thing back, what you do is send a letter giving them notice: I will be more than glad to continue this communication, if you’re going to bring a man or woman forward who will verify in open court, under oath or affirmation, a true bill of the amount due.
Without that true bill before the court that will be verifiable, you’re making a false claim, if you don’t stop, this will be a form of harassment, if you don’t stop from moving this false claim you will be causing I harm, it’s stressing me out and I don’t need this nonsense in my life. Now I’m suing you. Because when your court moves a claim against me, I will also move my claim against you.
Can the government license something which is unlawful? Can the government tell you it’s okay to break the law, can they? No, the government can’t tell you to do anything which is unlawful.
If it’s lawful to drive, then why do you have a drivers license? If someone can claim my drivers license then it’s not mine.
To require means to demand of right or by authority.
So, you say by what authority do you have to demand me to have this piece of plastic in my pocket?
They reply, well you have to have a drives license.
Well I didn’t create that thing it’s not mine, I can’t claim it because I’m not the creator of it, and it can be revoked or rescind, taken back from me at anytime at will by the creator of the department of motor vehicles.
Property means it’s proper to my person at the exclusion of all others, and I have the right to enjoy it and posses it, exclusive of all others.
So, if somebody can make a claim to this piece of plastic, than obviously it’s not mine. If somebody can control this piece of plastic and tell me what I can or cannot do with it, than obviously this is not mine, this is not my property.
Do you have a drivers license? No I don’t, it’s not mine. I didn’t create it, I’m not the creator of it; I can’t define it, I can’t describe it, I have no rights to it, it’s not mine.
You say to the police man on the side of the road “yes sir, no sir, have a nice day, thank you kind sir.” Just accept whatever tickets they want to give you. Please give me all the tickets that you got, I love taking tickets. I have nothing to do all day but sit here and take tickets.
You don’t negotiate on the side of road, you can get hit by a tractor trailer.
You just say, let’s do this as fast as we can so we don’t get hit by a tractor trailer, my name is dadada, and this is where I live.
You then make your proposal and you make your counter offer or whatever you want to call it, to the district attorney the next day, or whomever is going to prosecute this. Say sir whose going to prosecute this? Are you going to prosecute this sir? or are you going to give this to the prosecuting attorney? Okay, thank you sir, do you know where his office is at the top of your head? Do you know what his name is? Thank you.
Then you send a proposal back, I cannot accept such a generous offer, I cannot accept such a generous gift, it’s to much of a burden on me at this time, I cannot accept such a wonderful proposal for me to do this in exchange for that, but thank you anyway.
Or you can say he had no right what he did, but obviously I’m not going to argue with him on the side of the road, obviously I have the right to travel, obviously you can’t give a license to something which is unlawful, so obviously driving a car is lawful, and there is nothing in your code that says a man, whose obeying the law and not breaking the law, to be held liable, unless he causes harm or there is a claim before this court that’s verifiable.
First way you can do it, is say “please take your ticket back, because I cannot accept such a generous gift.”
Second way you can do it is say “I will pay you a dollar day, for the next 351 days, for this 351 dollar ticket.”
Or, third way you can make a claim against him and sue him, for interfering with your right to travel.
If he says no, then the debt is no longer due, because I made him an offer, and he has to accept it. He can’t say no, he knows the law. I tendered him an offer to settle the debt. He says “no you have to do this.” (I say) Did you just not accept my payment on the debt? Well you know the law, the debt is no longer due, you dishonored my offer. You gave me an offer for 300 dollars and 300 days in jail, well that’s a lovely offer, but I don’t want to go to jail, so I will pay you 300 dollars, but how about I pay you 5 dollars a week.
You can’t say no, he says this, you say yes sir, yes, yes, yes, yes. But, let me make you an offer, that you can do. But you certainly cannot say no.
You make the prosecutor the offer, the person who is pursuing you, the person who is the hunter, the person who is trying to get a pound of flesh from you. You ain’t settling anything with the Judge.